“There isn't any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any of the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after some distance they noticed the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't suggest that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. Such evidence cannot be treated as evidence of very last noticed.

The court emphasized that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity of the offense demands the most stringent punishment, taking into consideration the sanctity of human life and deterrence for prospective offenders.

Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may perhaps look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not reply to inquiries seeking legal information or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed to the court in which the case is or will be filed.

The court system is then tasked with interpreting the legislation when it can be unclear the way it relates to any given situation, frequently rendering judgments based around the intent of lawmakers as well as the circumstances from the case at hand. Such decisions become a guide for future similar cases.

82 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's effectively-settled that whilst contemplating the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to consider the advantage of the many suitable candidates and after because of deliberations, to grant promotion to this sort of eligible candidates who are found being most meritorious among them. Since the petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked because of the respondent department just to increase favor for the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy to the part of your respondent department.

A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar dilemma. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in applying the legislation. This get more info example of case law refers to two cases listened to in the state court, with the same level.

Online access into the case management system with the Court of Appeals of Virginia. Cases may be searched using name or case number.

acquitted the appellants from each of the charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )

The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, could be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It consists of the execution of your convicted person as being a consequence of their crime.

Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to your person, by performing an act which during the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently dangerous that it must in all likelihood cause death, causes the death of the such person, is claimed to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”

Additionally, it addresses the limitation period under Article 91 and one hundred twenty from the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more

The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to ascertain a commission of internationally known and recognized experts to review and rule on foreseeable future grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power traces.